Exegetical Review of Alma 5 from the Book of Mormon

 

Exegetical Review of Alma 5

[1] Now it came to pass that Alma began to deliver the word of God unto the people, first in the land of Zarahemla, and from thence throughout all the land.

[2] And these are the words which he spake to the people in the church which was established in the city of Zarahemla, according to his own record, saying:

The term church is a New Testament teaching Alma is supposed to be written 50 years prior to the birth of Christ, the word Church in Matthew 18 would be 30+ years after that Jesus birth hence the term and concept of the church would have been foreign to these people.

[3] I, Alma, having been consecrated by my father, Alma, to be a high priest over the church of God, he having power and authority from God to do these things, behold, I say unto you that he began to establish a church in the land which was in the borders of Nephi; yea, the land which was called the land of Mormon; yea, and he did baptize his brethren in the waters of Mormon.

Alma could not have been a high priest as only Levities can be of the priestly order. The scriptures make no accommodation for a substitute priestly order. This is why we do not see priest in the area of the Samaritans in the New Testament, no Levities live in Samaria they were all removed by the Assyrians

Baptism is a New Testament concept it was not found in OT teachings, and the concept would have foreign to a people disconnected from the Jews in Israel.

[4] And behold, I say unto you, they were delivered out of the hands of the people of king Noah, by the mercy and power of God.

[5] And behold, after that, they were brought into bondage by the hands of the Lamanites in the wilderness; yea, I say unto you, they were in captivity, and again the Lord did deliver them out of bondage by the power of his word; and we were brought into this land, and here we began to establish the church of God throughout this land also.Exodus Narrative

[6] And now behold, I say unto you, my brethren, you that belong to this church, have you sufficiently retained in remembrance the captivity of your fathers? Yea, and have you sufficiently retained in remembrance his mercy and long-suffering towards them? And moreover, have ye sufficiently retained in remembrance that he has delivered their souls from hell?

[7] Behold, he changed their hearts; yea, he awakened them out of a deep sleep, and they awoke unto God. Behold, they were in the midst of darkness; nevertheless, their souls were illuminated by the light of the everlasting word; yea, they were encircled about by the bands of death, and the chains of hell, and an everlasting destruction did await them.

[8] And now I ask of you, my brethren, were they destroyed? Behold, I say unto you, Nay, they were not.

[9] And again I ask, were the bands of death broken, and the chains of hell which encircled them about, were they loosed? I say unto you, Yea, they were loosed, and their souls did expand, and they did sing redeeming love. And I say unto you that they are saved.

[10] And now I ask of you on what conditions are they saved? Yea, what grounds had they to hope for salvation? What is the cause of their being loosed from the bands of death, yea, and also the chains of hell? Repetitive phrasing, a way that inexperience writers fill space.

[11] Behold, I can tell you -- did not my father Alma believe in the words which were delivered by the mouth of Abinadi? And was he not a holy prophet? Did he not speak the words of God, and my father Alma believe them?

[12] And according to his faith there was a mighty change wrought in his heart. Behold I say unto you that this is all true.

[13] And behold, he preached the word unto your fathers, and a mighty change was also wrought in their hearts, and they humbled themselves and put their trust in the true and living God. And behold, they were faithful until the end; therefore they were saved.

That one has to continue to do in order to be saved – works salvation.

[14] And now behold, I ask of you, my brethren of the church, have ye spiritually been born of God? Have ye received his image in your countenances? Have ye experienced this mighty change in your hearts?

[15] Do ye exercise faith in the redemption of him who created you? Do you look forward with an eye of faith, and view this mortal body raised in immortality, and this corruption raised in incorruption, to stand before God to be judged according to the deeds which have been done in the mortal body?

Paraphrased from 1 Corinthians 9:25

[16] I say unto you, can you imagine to yourselves that ye hear the voice of the Lord, saying unto you, in that day: Come unto me ye blessed, for behold, your works have been the works of righteousness upon the face of the earth?

[17] Or do ye imagine to yourselves that ye can lie unto the Lord in that day, and say -- Lord, our works have been righteous works upon the face of the earth -- and that he will save you?

[18] Or otherwise, can ye imagine yourselves brought before the tribunal of God with your souls filled with guilt and remorse, having a remembrance of all your guilt, yea, a perfect remembrance of all your wickedness, yea, a remembrance that ye have set at defiance the commandments of God?

[19] I say unto you, can ye look up to God at that day with a pure heart and clean hands? I say unto you, can you look up, having the image of God engraven upon your countenances?

[20] I say unto you, can ye think of being saved when you have yielded yourselves to become subjects to the devil?

[21] I say unto you, ye will know at that day that ye cannot be saved; for there can no man be saved except his garments are washed white; yea, his garments must be purified until they are cleansed from all stain, through the blood of him of whom it has been spoken by our fathers, who should come to redeem his people from their sins.

This concept of salvation through the shed blood the Messiah would have been foreign to these people, at the time of them leaving Israel the development of the Messiah was not clearly developed, and the concept of a Messiah who would sacrifice himself for the sins of others was simply nonexistent. These are concepts taken from the New Testament teachings.

[22] And now I ask of you, my brethren, how will any of you feel, if ye shall stand before the bar of God, having your garments stained with blood and all manner of filthiness? Behold, what will these things testify against you?

[23] Behold will they not testify that ye are murderers, yea, and also that ye are guilty of all manner of wickedness?

[24] Behold, my brethren, do ye suppose that such an one can have a place to sit down in the kingdom of God, with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob, and also all the holy prophets, whose garments are cleansed and are spotless, pure and white?

[25] I say unto you, Nay; except ye make our Creator a liar from the beginning, or suppose that he is a liar from the beginning, ye cannot suppose that such can have place in the kingdom of heaven; but they shall be cast out for they are the children of the kingdom of the devil.

This section contradicts current LDS theology as I have been told that almost no one goes into Outer darkness except those who deny God completely, so murders and people of all manner of wickedness like Hitler are said to be in the lowest lever of kingdom, while this says that these people are in the kingdom of the devil.

[26] And now behold, I say unto you, my brethren, if ye have experienced a change of heart, and if ye have felt to sing the song of redeeming love, I would ask, can ye feel so now?

[27] Have ye walked, keeping yourselves blameless before God? Could ye say, if ye were called to die at this time, within yourselves, that ye have been sufficiently humble? That your garments have been cleansed and made white through the blood of Christ, who will come to redeem his people from their sins?

This is a part in which we need to read this not as modern Christians, but as people who were living during this time in the Americas who have come over from Israel a thousand years before Christ. We cannot apply Christian presuppositions to this text and assume these people would know and understand what we know, and that is what is happening here with LDS folks who are reading this text, they are making assumptions which are bad assumptions. What follows are looking at what those assumptions cause.

Christ would not die on the cross for at least another 80 years and on the other side of the world, unless someone was time traveling there is no way for these people to understand this. Also the word Christ is Greek Christos if they were speaking Hebrew they would not have used Christos.

But here again the concept of the Messiah dying for sins would not have developed until after Jesus is risen from the dead.

And the first part of the verse would lead one to believe that they could be blameless before God, and that one could be sufficiently humble, and then it spell out the need for Christ sacrifice, but it does not explain what that sacrifice is.

[28] Behold, are ye stripped of pride? I say unto you, if ye are not ye are not prepared to meet God. Behold ye must prepare quickly; for the kingdom of heaven is soon at hand, and such an one hath not eternal life.

[29] Behold, I say, is there one among you who is not stripped of envy? I say unto you that such an one is not prepared; and I would that he should prepare quickly, for the hour is close at hand, and he knoweth not when the time shall come; for such an one is not found guiltless.

[30] And again I say unto you, is there one among you that doth make a mock of his brother, or that heapeth upon him persecutions?

[31] Wo unto such an one, for he is not prepared, and the time is at hand that he must repent or he cannot be saved!

[32] Yea, even wo unto all ye workers of iniquity; repent, repent, for the Lord God hath spoken it!

[33] Behold, he sendeth an invitation unto all men, for the arms of mercy are extended towards them, and he saith: Repent, and I will receive you.

[34] Yea, he saith: Come unto me and ye shall partake of the fruit of the tree of life; yea, ye shall eat and drink of the bread and the waters of life freely;

[35] Yea, come unto me and bring forth works of righteousness, and ye shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire –

Who is he, me? Is it God, is it Jesus, the text throws a bunch of pronouns out with a definitional noun. It says God but it describes Jesus. This is implied that these people already understand who Jesus is and the entire purpose of his ministry, and that is simply not possible, because this is like knowing how the story end before you even open up the book to read it.

[36] For behold, the time is at hand that whosoever bringeth forth not good fruit, or whosoever doeth not the works of righteousness, the same have cause to wail and mourn.

So the question here is if you do bring forth good fruit and do works of righteousness will you be saved absent the finished work of Christ?

[37] O ye workers of iniquity; ye that are puffed up in the vain things of the world, ye that have professed to have known the ways of righteousness nevertheless have gone astray, as sheep having no shepherd, notwithstanding a shepherd hath called after you and is still calling after you, but ye will not hearken unto his voice!

Puffed up is a 17th century English cultural term to mean prideful or arrogant. The KJV translators used terms like these that were relatable to the public at the time, another term would be God forbid. It has no origins in Hebrew.

[38] Behold, I say unto you, that the good shepherd doth call you; yea, and in his own name he doth call you, which is the name of Christ; and if ye will not hearken unto the voice of the good shepherd, to the name by which ye are called, behold, ye are not the sheep of the good shepherd.

Taken from John 10

[39] And now if ye are not the sheep of the good shepherd, of what fold are ye? Behold, I say unto you, that the devil is your shepherd, and ye are of his fold; and now, who can deny this? Behold, I say unto you, whosoever denieth this is a liar and a child of the devil.

Again John 10

[40] For I say unto you that whatsoever is good cometh from God, and whatsoever is evil cometh from the devil.

Phrase from James 1:17 and 1 John 3:18

[41] Therefore, if a man bringeth forth good works he hearkeneth unto the voice of the good shepherd, and he doth follow him; but whosoever bringeth forth evil works, the same becometh a child of the devil, for he hearkeneth unto his voice, and doth follow him.

[42] And whosoever doeth this must receive his wages of him; therefore, for his wages he receiveth death, as to things pertaining unto righteousness, being dead unto all good works.

Paraphrase Romans 4 and 6

[43] And now, my brethren, I would that ye should hear me, for I speak in the energy of my soul; for behold, I have spoken unto you plainly that ye cannot err, or have spoken according to the commandments of God.

[44] For I am called to speak after this manner, according to the holy order of God, which is in Christ Jesus; yea, I am commanded to stand and testify unto this people the things which have been spoken by our fathers concerning the things which are to come.

This is at minimum 50 years before Jesus birth and 30 years before His ministry. How can a people on the other side of the world, who prior to leaving had only a minimum view of the Messiah, have complete knowledge of who Jesus is?

[45] And this is not all. Do ye not suppose that I know of these things myself? Behold, I testify unto you that I do know that these things whereof I have spoken are true. And how do ye suppose that I know of their surety?

[46] Behold, I say unto you they are made known unto me by the Holy Spirit of God. Behold, I have fasted and prayed many days that I might know these things of myself. And now I do know of myself that they are true; for the Lord God hath made them manifest unto me by his Holy Spirit; and this is the spirit of revelation which is in me.

Again this is a New Testament concept that does not evolve until later in the church towards the end of the Book of Acts, in the Old Testament context of fasting and prayer was the repentance of sin (see 2 Samuel 7 with David and his sin with Uriah and Bathsheba). The concept of the Holy Spirit as well as the Messiah are not known to this time period, and yet these people know about it?

[47] And moreover, I say unto you that it has thus been revealed unto me, that the words which have been spoken by our fathers are true, even so according to the spirit of prophecy which is in me, which is also by the manifestation of the Spirit of God.

[48] I say unto you, that I know of myself that whatsoever I shall say unto you, concerning that which is to come, is true; and I say unto you, that I know that Jesus Christ shall come, yea, the Son, the Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace, and mercy, and truth. And behold, it is he that cometh to take away the sins of the world, yea, the sins of every man who steadfastly believeth on his name.

Clearly taken from John 1:14, and 1 John 2:2

[49] And now I say unto you that this is the order after which I am called, yea, to preach unto my beloved brethren, yea, and every one that dwelleth in the land; yea, to preach unto all, both old and young, both bond and free; yea, I say unto you the aged, and also the middle aged, and the rising generation; yea, to cry unto them that they must repent and be born again.

Born again is a New Testament concept, these people would not understand the reference, even when Jesus said this to Nicodemus, who was a teacher of the Old Testament, not even he understood what it meant to be born again, and yet we are expected to believe that people who left Israel long before the development of the Messiah in the OT was seen, these people would understand this terminology?

[50] Yea, thus saith the Spirit: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, for the kingdom of heaven is soon at hand; yea, the Son of God cometh in his glory, in his might, majesty, power, and dominion. Yea, my beloved brethren, I say unto you, that the Spirit saith: Behold the glory of the King of all the earth; and also the King of heaven shall very soon shine forth among all the children of men.

[51] And also the Spirit saith unto me, yea, crieth unto me with a mighty voice, saying: Go forth and say unto this people -- Repent, for except ye repent ye can in nowise inherit the kingdom of heaven.

[52] And again I say unto you, the Spirit saith: Behold, the ax is laid at the root of the tree; therefore every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit shall be hewn down and cast into the fire, yea, a fire which cannot be consumed, even an unquenchable fire. Behold, and remember, the Holy One hath spoken it.

Matthew 3:10 – And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees every tree therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire.

The problematic word here is “hewn” this an added 17th century word that is not found in the text, it was added by the KJV translators, it should not be there, the proper word is simply “cut” 17th century terminology should not be found in a 1century BC text, 17th century English was not a thing. And if your argument is that the translation is trying to put into understandable English words, that fails as well because “hewn” is 200 years prior to the 19th century English which would have been cut.

[53] And now my beloved brethren, I say unto you, can ye withstand these sayings; yea, can ye lay aside these things, and trample the Holy One under your feet; yea, can ye be puffed up in the pride of your hearts; yea, will ye still persist in the wearing of costly apparel and setting your hearts upon the vain things of the world, upon your riches?

Again puffed up is a cultural term from England placed into the text by the KJV translators.

[54] Yea, will ye persist in supposing that ye are better one than another; yea, will ye persist in the persecution of your brethren, who humble themselves and do walk after the holy order of God, wherewith they have been brought into this church, having been sanctified by the Holy Spirit, and they do bring forth works which are meet for repentance --

[55] Yea, and will you persist in turning your backs upon the poor, and the needy, and in withholding your substance from them?

[56] And finally, all ye that will persist in your wickedness, I say unto you that these are they who shall be hewn down and cast into the fire except they speedily repent.

[57] And now I say unto you, all you that are desirous to follow the voice of the good shepherd, come ye out from the wicked, and be ye separate, and touch not their unclean things; and behold, their names shall be blotted out, that the names of the wicked shall not be numbered among the names of the righteous, that the word of God may be fulfilled, which saith: The names of the wicked shall not be mingled with the names of my people;

[58] For the names of the righteous shall be written in the book of life, and unto them will I grant an inheritance at my right hand. And now, my brethren, what have ye to say against this? I say unto you, if ye speak against it, it matters not, for the word of God must be fulfilled.

[59] For what shepherd is there among you having many sheep doth not watch over them, that the wolves enter not and devour his flock? And behold, if a wolf enter his flock doth he not drive him out? Yea, and at the last, if he can, he will destroy him.

[60] And now I say unto you that the good shepherd doth call after you; and if you will hearken unto his voice he will bring you into his fold, and ye are his sheep; and he commandeth you that ye suffer no ravenous wolf to enter among you, that ye may not be destroyed.

Here is a different Jesus that what we find in the Good Shepherd passages found in John 10

Notice the contrast:

John 10:14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.

John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

John 10:28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

Jesus is not bringing anyone into the fold, they are already in the fold, He already knows who they are, and no ravenous wolf can destroy them, see verse 28. Jesus sheep will not be lead away by a false teacher, that happens to the sheep that are not of Jesus fold.

[61] And now I, Alma, do command you in the language of him who hath commanded me, that ye observe to do the words which I have spoken unto you.

[62] I speak by way of command unto you that belong to the church; and unto those who do not belong to the church I speak by way of invitation, saying: Come and be baptized unto repentance, that ye also may be partakers of the fruit of the tree of life.

This is actually the baptism of John the Baptist, John baptized unto repentance (Acts 19:4), but then it points to baptismal regeneration, since this follows what was said about the Good Shepherd, which is a clear reference to Jesus, it would imply that this teaching of baptismal regeneration would have come from Jesus teachings, except it does not. While people like to contend that Jesus taught baptismal regeneration now where in the NT does Jesus say, baptism is required for salvation, or brings salvation.

 

Notable

Repetitive Phrases – “I say unto you” – 36 times in 62 verses, evidence of human writing.

Conclusion – What is clear is that Joseph Smith writes much of this as if he is writing to a modern Christian audience, hence why LDS folks say that the Book of Mormon speaks of Jesus more than any book, well that is because it was on purpose, Smith wrote it that way, that was his hook. But in linking it to a person who would have existed well before the full evolution of the Messianic person would develop, one has to ask the obvious if I read it like I was listening to Alma saying this stuff, would I have a clue what he is talking about? The answer is no, it would be impossible. The Jesus Christ he is speaking of has not been born and will not be born for another 50 years, The concept of the Messiah had not been developed when they left the Middle East, hence bring up a Messianic figure would have been just as meaningless as the name Jesus. No concept of what Jesus purpose is, not who Jesus is, and add to it, that it is all taking place on the other side of the planet adds another element that precludes the person listening to Alma being able to make heads or tails of what he is talking about.

And that is the thing, Joseph was not writing this to the 1st century BC person, he was writing it to the 19th century AD person, and hence they understand it all. That precludes this being an ancient text written on golden plates, it is nothing more than 19th century Bible fan fiction written on paper.

 

Darin Bracy is the pastor at Yorktown Baptist Church in Yorktown Virginia. He is a graduate of Veritas Baptist College with a BA in Ministry and a minor in History. He has a wife Stacy, two daughters, Ashlynne and her husband Justin, their daughter Harper Darin's other daughter Aftyn, and her two dogs, Eddie and Lulubelle.

You can reach Darin at his email address, Darinbracy@gmail.com and you can see his video content on YouTube – Basic Baptist Guy

Comments

  1. It would appear that your primary objection is that the BoM is TOO Christian, because Israelites who left Jerusalem in 600 BC would not have had access to the very Christian, very NT elements expressed in the BoM.

    If you're relying on the KJV version of the OT, that would make sense. Christ as spiritual savior, baptism, rebirth, all of that -- it's not there.

    But doesn't that strike you as odd? The central religous event in earth's history, the Atonement of Christ, not presaged in the OT? You're right about Nicodemus not understanding what "born again" means, and the Jews were obviously looking for a Messiah to deliver them from Roman occupation, not from sin.

    Is it possible that the prophets of old did prophecy more explicitly of Christ and teach those NT concepts? What if well-meaning (or wicked) scholars removed those prophecies, such that they were missing from the canon that Nicodemus studied? What if scholars removed such prophecies because they were in the grip of an ideological craze (such as we find ourselves in today), and the prophesies seemed false or illogical or embarassing or they ran crosswise to the preferences of powerful men? (I speculate on one possible cause.)

    "But God would never let that happen. He would have kept his Bible intact."

    I would prefer that be the case as well, but God also allows people to do terrible things -- without directly fixing them -- so that they will be all the more condemned on Judgement Day.

    We posit that the brass plates that Lehi and his family removed from Jerusalem were likely a version of the Old Testament kept by the northern Kingdom of Israel (Lehi was tribe Manasseh), not the version kept by the Kingdom of Judah, and therefore it would have contained books written by northern kingdom prophets. The BoM mentions Zenos and Zenock, who apparently taught Christ explicitly. The OT also mentions books that we don't have, especially in 1 and 2 Chronicles.

    If scholars (or others) did remove prophecies of Christ from the OT, then the Book of Mormon was prepared by God to restore those truths and to bear testimony that Christ had been taught since ancient times.

    You want proof, I know. I'm afraid I'm not well-versed enough in the literature to pull stuff off the top of my head. So I'll provide some other sources that might be of interest:

    -- https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/archive/publications/are-books-of-scripture-missing-from-the-bible -- Whether books are missing from the OT

    -- https://scripturecentral.org/knowhy/why-do-new-testament-words-and-phrases-show-up-in-the-book-of-mormon -- How NT concepts might have ended up in the BoM

    -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3SH_-E-x2E -- Linguists disucss the odd grammatical structures in the BoM and whether they point to Hebrew or Egyptian as the original BoM langauge.

    -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy2i_mriJRw&t=24s -- A linguist finds ~1700 Hebrew/Egyptian cognates in Uto-Aztecan

    -- https://interpreterfoundation.org/journal/is-the-book-of-mormon-a-pseudo-archaic-text -- Whether KJV-istic language of the BoM is comparable to other pseudo-biblical texts

    -- https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/blog/2009/06/29/plain-and-precious-things -- BoM teachings vs Biblical

    Fact is, we could go back and forth, tit for tat, assertion and refutation, and we'd never get anywhere. You accept evidences according to your priors just as I do according to mine.

    I appreciate the time you took to prepare the analysis of Alma 5. There's a lot to think about on all sides of this issue.

    Until we meet at Jesus' feet...

    ReplyDelete
  2. You seem to totally ignore that the text is out of time with it subject matter.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sunday Sermon - June 21, 2026 - Gospel of Mark 7:24-30 - A Woman of Faith

Sunday Sermon - Gospel of Mark 6:45-56 - Walking on the Water

Sermon - Sunday May 31, 2026 - The Gospel of Mark 6:30-49 - The Feeding of the 5,000